An experimental AI workspace that helps teams explore ideas, prototype concepts, and think about products in a more exploratory, less linear way.
📝 Tool Overview
This tool is an experimental initiative from Google focused on rethinking how digital products are conceived and built. Rather than starting with rigid briefs or predefined flows, it encourages teams to explore ideas through AI‑assisted prompts, artefacts, and interactive building blocks.
The core problem it addresses is early‑stage product thinking — the messy middle where ideas are half‑formed, constraints are unclear, and teams need space to explore before committing to specs or design systems. It positions itself as a creative and conceptual sandbox rather than a production tool.

đź’ˇ Key Features
- AI‑assisted idea exploration focused on concepts, behaviours, and outcomes rather than screens
- Interactive building blocks that encourage experimentation over polished deliverables
- Designed for ambiguity, supporting early‑stage thinking and reframing problems
- Lightweight, web‑based experience with minimal setup
- Part of Google’s experimental ecosystem, signalling ongoing iteration and learning
📌 Use Cases
- Product designers exploring new interaction models or speculative concepts
- PMs shaping problem spaces before locking in requirements or roadmaps
- Design leaders facilitating workshops around future bets or blue‑sky ideas
- Cross‑functional teams aligning on vision before moving into delivery tools
- Early discovery phases where speed and exploration matter more than fidelity
📊 Differentiators
- Strong emphasis on exploration over execution, unlike most AI design tools
- Conceptual and reflective by design, not optimised for production output
- Backed by Google’s research‑driven approach rather than commercial tooling pressure
- A refreshingly open‑ended experience compared with rigid prompt‑to‑output workflows
👍 Pros & 👎 Cons
- Encourages better thinking before committing to solutions
- Low friction entry — easy to try without onboarding overhead
- Feels purpose‑built for discovery rather than retrofitted with AI
- Lacks direct export or integration into mainstream design and PM tools
- Not suitable for detailed design, handoff, or delivery phases
đź§ Ai for Pro Verdict
From a product design perspective, this is less a tool you “use” daily and more a space you visit when you want to think differently. It won’t replace Figma, PRDs, or backlogs — and it shouldn’t. Where it shines is helping experienced teams slow down just enough to explore better ideas before accelerating into build mode.